Stop the Extradition of Sean Garland

Latest News

Home
Funds Urgently Needed/Defend Sean Garland Campaign
Letters of Support
Newspaper Articles
Latest News
Biography
Online Petition
Events
List of Sponsors
Download
Solidarity / Support
What You Can Do
Contacts
Links
Archive

Latest Press Releases (newest first)

Will the U.S. government get away with the power to target and kill individuals, including U.S. citizens, far from any armed conflict and without charge, trial, or judicial process? This is the central question in Al-Aulaqi v. Obama , a lawsuit CCR and the ACLU filed today in federal court. 

We recently had a small victory in our efforts to contest the legality of a kill-list maintained by the
U.S. government.  On August 3, 2010, we wrote to tell you that we filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Treasury Department and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to dispute the constitutionality of a licensing scheme that requires lawyers to seek government permission to represent individuals the same government intends to kill. The government put U.S. citizen Anwar Al-Aulaqi on a kill-list, then added him to an OFAC list last month, making it a crime for CCR and the ACLU to challenge the government's authority to kill him.  On August 4, the day after we filed our lawsuit against OFAC, OFAC granted CCR and the ACLU a license to provide pro bono legal services to Anwar Al-Aulaqi's father Nasser Al-Aulaqi as representative of his interests.  Although we obtained a license, we will continue to pursue our challenge to the OFAC regulations because it is unconstitutional to require lawyers to ask the government for permission to challenge the legality of its conduct.

Today, CCR and ACLU have filed a lawsuit on behalf of Nasser Al-Aulaqi against President Obama,
CIA Director Leon Panetta, and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.  The lawsuit aims to stop the U.S. government from carrying out a "targeted killing" far away from any armed conflict, without due process, and where there is not an imminent threat and lethal force is not necessary.  Anwar Al-Aulaqi has not been charged with any crime, but has reportedly been the target of several strikes in Yemen, a country in which the U.S. is not engaged in war but where air strikes have caused civilian casualties and popular protests, and where he is believed to be in hiding.  Outside the context of armed conflict (Yemen is almost 2000 miles away from Iraq and Afghanistan), targeted killing is permissible under international law only as a last resort and in the face of a truly imminent threat - and then only because the imminence of the threat makes judicial process infeasible. Outside these narrow circumstances, targeted killing amounts to the imposition of a death sentence without charge or trial.  The government's authorization to kill U.S. citizen Al-Aulaqi far from any armed conflict violates his Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force and his Fifth Amendment right to due process before being deprived of life and to have notice of the criteria that make a person targetable for death.  It also constitutes an extrajudicial killing in violation of international law.    

Regardless of the government's allegations against Anwar al-Aulaqi or any person suspected of wrongdoing, authorizing the death of individuals on secret standards, far from any conflict zone, and outside of any legal process not only violates the Constitution and international law, but seriously undermines our collective safety.  The executive should not be able to act as judge, jury, and executioner, substituting its own bureaucratic process for the due process required by law. The
U.S. government should not be able to claim the sweeping authority to carry out extrajudicial killings of U.S. citizens or other individuals far from any actual battlefield, nor make the dangerous contention that the entire world is now a battlefield. Such assertions of power will inevitably target innocent people-the U.S. government has a long and well-documented history of wrongly accusing both citizens and foreigners of terrorism and of being a threat to national security-and kill scores of innocent bystanders, undermining the rule of law and effectively creating a war without boundaries or end.

If the government suspects individuals of criminal activity, they should be charged and tried in a court of law, not put to death on the government's say-so.  

We will keep you updated on this important case. To read more, visit our case page .

Thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

Vincent Warren
Executive Director
Center
for Constitutional Rights 
   

Communist Party of Greece Central Committee
 
 
 

Athens, 27th May 2010

 

We, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, denounce the unacceptable political prosecution against Sean Garland, the leader of the Workers’ Party of Ireland, which is based on unsubstantiated and false accusations. Sean Garland was arrested in 2005, during the Party’s Congress, and since then has lived under the constant threat of extradition to the US on the grounds of unfounded accusations, such as a communist conspiracy undermining the US dollar.

Sean Garland’s indictment is against the democratic rights and freedoms.

We demand the immediate stop of the political indictment and manipulation against Sean Garland and the withdrawal of his unreasonable extradition to the US .

 

 

PAPARIGA Aleka – General Secretary of the CC of KKE


GKIOKAS Yannis 

HALVATZIS Spiridon 

HARALAMPOUS Haralampos

KALANTIDOU Sofia

KANELLI Liana

KARATHANASOPOULOS Nikos 

KAZAKOS Costas

MANOLAKOU Diamando

MARINOS Giorgos  

MAVRIKOS Georgios

MORAITIS Nikos

NANOS Apostolos

NIKOLAIDOU Vera 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PAFILIS Athanasios

PAPACONSTANTINOU Nicolaos

PROTOULIS Yannis

SKOPELITIS Stavros 

SKYLLAKOS Antonis

TZEKIS Aggelos – industrial worker

ZIOGAS Yannis - university professor

 

The members of the European parliamentary group:

TOUSSAS Giorgos

ANGOURAKIS Charalampos

 

Bail application to be resumed Tuesday

Defend Sean Garland!